botox treatments uk |
Friday, 20 September 2013
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
Brief Discussion About Medical Treatments
We are relentlessly inundated with marketing
advice. However this consel does not
emanate from governing aurthorities the likes of the General Medical and Dental
Councils.If a patient feels that she was “done” in a flurry, in front of the
judge, she will wax lyrical on how she was done in a hurry and felt
shortchanged. In medical Facial Injectables
London included injectable based
treatments by aesthetic virtue.
Another misconception lies in the perception
of the associated downtime. It is often
accepted as true that quick and simple equates to negligible pain thereafter or
compromise on daily activities. A prime
example is the lip augmentation procedure, which rarely takes up more than
twenty minutes of our precious time.
However, returning to work straight after would beg an interrogation and
concern of recent assault. And no, the
boss would not approve of the swollen and bruised pout in the next meeting,
especially if orally incontinent and lisping post nerve block! I am still to
see a micro needling victim jumping into a cab heading straight back to the
City after I’m done with her! Herein
lies the worth of the consultation, which very often, especially if it is the
initial doctor patient chat can effectively last longer than lunch time!So, it
is certainly not a ‘ooh, just spotted this on the high street, perhaps I’ll
just nip in for a quick fix jab, fill and tox, and lo behold, my summer
freeze!’ It might be somewhat acceptable
that a patient is in and out of the clinic in 30 minutes should the procedure
in question takes little time, the patient is not a novice to the treatment and
the doctor is content that he is comfortable carrying out the intervention
given the patient’s condition and knowledge on the subject matter.
Whereas straightforward brief procedures,
such as a repeat toxin treatment or steroid injections for London
botox treatments might be well suited and indeed comfortably squeezed
into the tea break, the blatant unashamed marketing of more complex and lengthy
procedures such as minimally invasive breast augmentation or minimal access
liposuction as lunch time contender, is a hoodwink. Truthfully, the interventions are far less
invasive and painful than their classical surgical counterparts. However, there is no way a patient should or
could return to the office following such surgery. So, in essence the beauty brigade shouldn’t
take this marketing moniker too far by applying it universally to the wide array
of procedures offered. Misleading a
patient often means disappointing a patient, and an unhappy patient tells
twenty people. Happy patients on the other hand will only sing our praises to
five souls. Breeding a progeny of
discontented and disgruntled patients is injurious to the doctor’s reputation,
and that of the profession in its entirety.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)